Trump Appeals To Supreme Court for Permission To Dismiss Head of Whistleblower Agency

President Donald Trump has reached out to the U.S. Supreme Court, requesting authorization to terminate the head of an independent agency responsible for the protection of government whistleblowers.

What Happened: President Trump has turned to the Supreme Court for the first time in his pursuit to remove federal officials who do not conform to his viewpoints, as reported by Bloomberg on Monday.

The application urges the court to revoke a temporary restraining order that shields Hampton Dellinger, the head of the U.S. Office of Special Counsel, from being ousted from his role for 14 days.

This urgent appeal to the Supreme Court comes after a divided federal appeals court rejected the administration’s request for intervention on Saturday night, deeming it premature.

Acting Solicitor General Sarah Harris stated in the Supreme Court filing, “This court should not allow lower courts to seize executive power by dictating to the president how long he must continue employing an agency head against his will.”

Also Read: Mary Trump Warns DNI Gabbard Could Lead To ‘Catastrophic Outcome’: ‘A Known Russian Asset,’ Defender of ‘Murderous Dictator’ Assad

The appeals court decision, which was split 2-1, stated that allowing the administration to appeal the temporary order rather than waiting two weeks for a more comprehensive trial court ruling would be a “sharp departure” from normal court procedures.

The dissenting judge, Trump-appointed Judge Gregory Katsas, argued that it is “virtually unheard of” for a court to block the president from firing the head of an agency.

As per standard Supreme Court procedures, Trump’s filing will be reviewed by Chief Justice John Roberts, who has the discretion to act independently or refer the matter to the full court. Dellinger declined to comment on the filing.

Why It Matters: This move by President Trump represents a significant escalation in his ongoing efforts to reshape the federal bureaucracy to align with his views.

The outcome of this case could have far-reaching implications for the balance of power between the executive branch and the judiciary, potentially setting a precedent for future administrations.

Read Next

Market Instability Looms in Trump’s Second Term, Warns Paul Tudor Jones: ‘There’s No Room for Mistakes’

Image: Shutterstock