28-Year-Old Put Inheritance In A Trust For Her Kid, But Fiancé Thinks It's 'Selfish' — She Says, 'My Daughter Shouldn't Have to Split Her Wealth'

When you're planning a wedding, you expect drama over seating charts—not trust funds. But for one 28-year-old woman, protecting her daughter's financial future sparked something much bigger than a minor disagreement—it forced her to question the future of her entire relationship.

In the Reddit post, she explained she's a single mom to a 9-year-old daughter and the sole heir to her late grandfather's estate. After being disowned by her parents during college, it was her grandfather who stepped in and raised her—and when he passed away, he left her everything. "He loved her," she wrote, referring to her daughter. "He left it to me believing I would pass it on to her."

Don't Miss:

• The same firms that backed Uber, Venmo and eBay are investing in this pre-IPO company disrupting a $1.8T market — and you can too at just $2.90/share.
• $100k+ in investable assets? Match with a fiduciary advisor for free to learn how you can maximize your retirement and save on taxes – no cost, no obligation.

She's been with her fiancé Max, 35, for four years and living together for over one. Max has two children of his own, ages 6 and 10, and full custody. Their mother lives across the country and has little to no contact with them. Everyone seemed to get along well—until she brought up the idea of buying her daughter a pony for her birthday.

Max was frustrated by what he saw as an extravagant gift. She clarified that the pony wouldn't come out of their shared budget—it would be paid for with her money. Still, Max argued that if her daughter was getting a pony, then his kids should get one too. When she said they could split the cost, Max pushed back again, saying she should cover it entirely. After all, "you're rich," he told her, and "it's your decision to buy her a pony in the first place."

That conversation sparked something bigger. She realized Max might eventually expect her to split everything—including her inheritance—equally between all three kids. But, as she explained, "My daughter should not have to split her generational wealth. It's not mine, it's my grandpa's." So, before the wedding, she created two trusts: one holding 50% of the estate for her daughter, and another with 30% set aside for her own retirement. The remaining 20% was reserved for the house and emergency needs.

Trending: ‘Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. You can invest today for just $0.30/share.

Max discovered the trust documents in a drawer and was furious. "He said that if I was marrying him, we would be sharing all assets and finances," she wrote. "That it's not fair for me to keep 90% of my wealth just to myself and my kid when he is sharing all of his with us." When she pointed out that he wasn't bringing any inheritance into the marriage either, Max replied, "That's because I have none, and it's incredibly selfish of me to not share."

He also accused her of "discriminating and depriving his kids of an equally good life."

The internet wasn't having it. Commenters flooded her post with red flags and warnings. "This man is not wanting a partner," one user wrote. "He wants a gold mine." Another said, "Reading OP's story makes me want to scream, ‘Don't marry this guy.'" Many praised her decision to create the trusts and urged her to get a prenup and see an estate lawyer immediately—especially before commingling assets with someone who sees her inheritance as community property.

To her credit, she took the advice seriously.

In her update, she shared that she had a calm conversation with Max, showed him the Reddit responses, and to his credit, he didn't argue. He even offered to sign a prenup. Still, she couldn't shake her doubts. "The fact is there is no way it can be made fair to everyone," she wrote. "Financially we are just not compatible."

See Also: Accredited Investors: Grab Pre-IPO Shares of the AI Company Powering Hasbro, Sephora & MGM—Secure $0.63 Shares Before 8/14

She emphasized that she still loves Max, but not enough to put her daughter's future at risk. "I love Max. I really do. But I love my daughter a million times more."

The engagement is now off. She returned the ring and made it clear that, for now, marriage is off the table. "There is no real necessity to get married," she wrote. "We are both sad about this turn, but the fact he did not kick up a fuss is a bit reassuring."

They're still living together—for now—and she's continuing to contribute her fair share of expenses. But she's keeping her assets protected and her priorities straight. Her daughter will still be getting that pony. "It's a gift from her great-grandpa, after all," she said. And Max's kids? If they express an interest, she's open to riding lessons—but there won't be three ponies.

For anyone blending families, this story is a reminder that love is not a financial plan. Whether it's through trusts, prenups, or dual agreements, having clear boundaries before a marriage—especially when one person brings in inherited wealth—isn't just smart. It's essential. A good estate lawyer or financial advisor can help set those boundaries so love doesn't get tangled in resentment, legal fees, or unequal expectations.

Because as this mom proved, protecting your child's future isn't selfish. It's responsible. And sometimes, the most loving thing you can do is walk away before "forever" turns into a financial disaster.

Read Next: Warren Buffett once said, "If you don't find a way to make money while you sleep, you will work until you die." Here’s how you can earn passive income with just $10.

Image: Shutterstock